Since payments and service teams focus on the customer experience, both teams have a direct impact on chargeback volume. How they operate determines the potential revenue losses due to disputes. And previously, fighting chargebacks became a job for just customer service reps. As volume increased, reps couldn’t handle the workload, to the point where they did not even attempt to win false claims. All the while, payments teams never addressed the root causes for potential disputes found within the payment process.
Luckily, investing in cross-team collaboration can help you address the issue of chargebacks and transaction disputes.
- Combined fraud strategies: First, payments and service teams can use cross-department fraud defense tactics such as fraud alert systems, detection analysis tools, shared case investigations, and verification protocols. These efforts limit chargebacks due to true fraud (true fraud refers to the use of stolen credit card info by a criminal third party). As an example, fraud screening tools integrated by payment teams can result in fraud alerts that service reps are able to act upon. Together, both teams flag fraudulent transactions before they turn into future chargeback disputes.
- Combined payment flows: Second, collaboration can improve checkout flows. That helps limit chargebacks due to user confusion, forgetfulness, and buyer’s remorse. In addition, recent data shows that the average cart abandonment rate is 70%, with around 28% of consumers citing a checkout process that is too long or complicated as the reason for such abandonment. It pays to improve your sales journey and limit chargebacks due to procedural errors (which contribute to 20-40% of chargeback volume).
Cross-team efforts could include creating clear billing descriptors, transparent product info, user-friendly pay interfaces, and post-purchase communication. Users can then recognize charges, find receipts, and contact customer service for any issues. Without such efforts, a customer might opt for the convenience of a chargeback instead.
- Combined dispute resolution: Third, both payment and service teams are needed to optimize the chargeback process. A higher dispute win rate recovers lost revenue, a crucial aspect for the health of any business. But recent data shows that almost two-thirds of surveyed merchants rarely dispute a chargeback, if at all. When asked the reason why, the highest percentage cited not winning enough representments to justify the cost. Collaboration offers a solution to that problem, as cross-team efforts lower costs while improving win rates. For example, departments that share data can compile high-quality evidence at a fraction of the expense. The result is improved issue resolution.
- Combined service efforts: Fourth, collaboration boosts service quality. For example, integrated payment and service teams are better equipped to ensure prompt order fulfillment. And trained support reps might handle payment-related inquiries all while maintaining continuous consumer contact. Such efforts have a direct impact on chargebacks related to delivery problems, product issues, or communication issues. Moreover, recent data shows that 77% of customers who had a positive payment journey are willing to forgive a bad experience, and that included disputes. With the help of payments, service teams can deflect what would have been a chargeback if both teams operated in silos.