Webinar: Fight or flight? Alerts, disputes and the hidden costs of chargebacks – May 13th 12PM Eastern
Webinar: Fight or flight? Alerts, disputes and the hidden costs of chargebacks –
May 13th 12PM Eastern
As the world becomes increasingly cashless, the need for robust and efficient fraud detection systems has never been more critical. This is where machine learning comes into play. Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence, has shown immense potential in detecting and preventing credit card fraud, revolutionizing the way businesses approach this issue. In this article, we delve into the world of credit card fraud detection with machine learning, exploring how this technology is shaping the future of secure transactions.
Credit card fraud is a form of identity theft where an individual uses another person’s credit card information without their consent, typically for personal gain. This type of fraud can take many forms, from simple card theft to more sophisticated methods such as skimming and phishing.
For instance, consider the case of a major retail company Target that fell victim to a massive credit card breach in 2013. Target experienced a data breach during the holiday season, which resulted in the theft of 40 million customers’ credit and debit card information. The hackers installed malware on the point-of-sale (POS) systems in the company’s stores to collect card details, leading to one of the largest credit card fraud incidents in history. For the government analysis of the attack, go here. The damage to Target was estimated to exceed a quarter of billion dollars.
Implementing machine learning for detecting the use of fraudulent credit card information involves several steps, starting with data collection. Machine learning models require a large amount of data for training.
For instance, the credit card network and payments company Mastercard uses machine learning to analyze transactions in real-time. Their system, Decision Intelligence, uses thousands of data points to create a predictive score for each transaction, which is then used to determine if the transaction is likely to be fraudulent. This score is based on the customer’s purchasing behavior, location, time of purchase, and other factors. By analyzing these data points, Decision Intelligence can accurately detect fraudulent transactions and reduce false declines, improving the customer experience.
The billions of data points used in machine learning for fraud detection typically include transaction details such as the amount, time, location, and other relevant information. Once the data is collected, it is preprocessed and used to train the machine learning model.
As digital transactions increase exponentially, so does the need for robust and advanced fraud detection and prevention mechanisms. This development along with the creation of billions of usable data points is now pushing us beyond traditional rule-based systems towards more sophisticated machine learning models. These models, driven by data science, offer not only scalability but also pattern detection capabilities that may prove elusive to human analysts.
In the world of data science, there is an intriguing trade-off between model explainability and accuracy. Sophisticated models with hundreds or even thousands of parameters may perform extraordinarily in detecting fraud, yet their complexity makes it virtually impossible to fully understand their underlying calculations. Simplifying these models to enhance their explainability can often come at the expense of their predictive performance.
However, in post-transaction fraud detection, which is crucial to chargeback mitigation, explainability assumes critical importance. Fraud detection solutions must offer a clear rationale behind labeling a transaction as a fraudulent one, particularly when it involves friendly fraud (FF) – a type of fraud wherein the cardholder disputes a legitimate charge. Notably, this explanation becomes crucial when analyzing the solution’s performance for a merchant. It enables a clear differentiation between true fraud (TF) cases, which have very low win rates and are often won on technicalities, and FF, where detection solutions hold significant potential.
In general, fraud detection processes significantly differ in the pre-transaction and post-transaction phases. Post-transaction detection leverages a detailed set of data, including customer communication with the merchant after the purchase and any post-transaction manipulation of information like the delivery address. Furthermore, it allows analysts to view the transactions following the suspicious one, providing a fuller picture of potentially fraudulent activities.
However, post-transaction fraud detection, especially for chargeback mitigation solutions, is limited by the amount of data it can access, compared to pre-transaction fraud prevention solutions. For instance, prevention solutions may have access to data on the entire customer journey, which may not be available for post-transaction detection.
Every company begins its fraud detection journey with a rules-based mechanism. However, the advantages of a machine learning-based solution are substantial, particularly in terms of scalability and pattern detection that may not be easily discernible to human analysts.
To effectively transition, organizations need to ensure strong machine learning foundations from the outset. Coding the rule engine, fully documenting changes, and adequately tagging fraud cases are essential preparatory steps. Then, depending on the business and assuming the data is appropriately stored, a switch to machine learning should be considered when scalability becomes a requirement or when the potential of the rule-based system has reached its limits.
In the continuously evolving landscape of digital transactions, data science plays a pivotal role in bolstering fraud detection and prevention. Although the trade-off between model explainability and accuracy presents a challenge, it is clear that the future of fraud detection lies in machine learning models that offer scalability and advanced pattern detection. The shift from pre-transaction to post-transaction detection, driven by this machine learning wave, is evidence of the progress being made in the fight against fraud, shaping a safer digital transaction environment.
Starting June 17, 2025, Stripe is rolling out a major change to how it charges merchants for disputes, and if you’re not prepared, it could get expensive fast. This post will walk you through what’s changing, why it matters, and how merchants should think about Stripe chargebacks. For more information, see Stripe’s announcement here. What’s […]
Chargeback alerts and Rapid Dispute Resolution (RDR) are important tools for merchants. Using them wisely as part of an overall chargeback management strategy is key to maintaining a good reputation with card issuers. Alerts, RDR and chargeback automation have a significant impact on merchant bottom lines. While we’ve been offering chargeback alerts and RDR for […]
Payment methods and fraud techniques are ever evolving, and that means your stack needs to evolve even faster. However, with so many technologies available, it’s hard to know what’s needed, what’s useful, and what you can do without. This article examines the essentials for any payment stack in 2025, as well as emerging technologies that […]
Chargebacks don’t just entail payment reversals for merchants, but also additional fees levied by acquirers to cover the costs of managing the chargeback process. The chargeback fee, along with the chargeback amount, is normally subtracted from the payment due to the merchant in the period when a payment dispute is filed. Many acquirers and PSPs make the […]
Travel and hospitality related friendly fraud is sky high and rising – incurring huge costs to businesses forced to devote time and money to combatting illegitimate chargebacks. This marks a crisis for an industry where mere percentage points dictate who soars high and who goes under. Fortunately, a range of tools and strategies are available […]
Visa has rolled out a new program that’s changing how merchants and acquirers are monitored for chargeback and fraud ratios. Keep reading to learn what you need to know. The new Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP) went into effect on April 1, 2025, consolidating the Visa Dispute Monitoring Program (VDMP) and Visa Fraud Monitoring Program […]